Baca artikel IDN Research Institute lainnya di IDN App
It helps you see more of our articles when you search on Google
As Budgets Tighten, Consumers Reorder Their Spending Priorities
shopping at the supermarket (pexels.com/cottonbro studio)
  • Retail sales contracted for three months in 2026 before growing 1.1% in July, but the recovery has been uneven; information and communication equipment remains down 20.6% year-on-year.

  • When budgets tighten, consumers tend to protect functional necessities, postpone high-value purchases, cut back on purchase frequency or spending amounts, and choose more affordable products.

  • Spending priorities differ across generations: Gen Z places greater priority on beauty and personal care, fashion, and dining out, whereas Millennials prioritize groceries, electricity, and housing.

This section summary was AI-assisted and reviewed by our editorial team.

When purchasing power weakens, the question in brand meeting rooms is usually the same: have consumers stopped shopping?

Bank Indonesia's retail sales data for 2026 points to a more important question. Retail sales briefly fell into contraction for three months before turning positive again in July, but the recovery has not been even across categories.

In other words, the issue is not simply whether consumers are still spending money. It is what they still consider worth spending it on.

For marketers, this shift matters. When budget space narrows, consumers do not cut all spending proportionally. They reprioritize: some purchases are postponed, some are kept at a smaller amount, and spending seen as functional continues to hold its place.

Retail Recovers, but Consumer Budgets Have Not Returned to Every Category

Citing Bank Indonesia's Retail Sales Survey (Survei Penjualan Eceran, SPE), retail sales that grew 6.5% in February turned to contraction for three consecutive months, hitting a low of -3.9% in May. July returned to positive territory at 1.1%, while August is projected to grow 0.5%.

The SPE is a monthly Bank Indonesia survey of around 700 retailers in ten cities. The figures therefore describe changes in sales on the retail side, not changes in income or the sequence of consumers' spending decisions directly.

The aggregate figure looks reassuring, but only up to a point. Once the data is broken down by category, the recovery looks lopsided: some categories have returned to growth, while others remain far behind.

For marketers, these differences between categories are more informative than the aggregate figure. Retail returning to growth does not automatically mean all discretionary spending has recovered.

The Greatest Pressure Falls on Purchases That Are Easier to Postpone

Bank Indonesia's 2026 Real Sales Index (Indeks Penjualan Riil, IPR) table shows that when total retail turned positive in July, one category was still lagging far behind. Information and communication equipment was still contracting 20.6% year-on-year, after staying in double-digit negative territory throughout January to July.

Apparel, and cultural and recreational goods, show pressure in different patterns. Apparel briefly turned positive at 2.8% in July, then is projected to return to -9.8% in August. Cultural and recreational goods, which grew 15.9% in January, turned to -6.2% in June and -6.7% in July.

Compare this with spare parts and accessories, which grew 18.8% in June, just when total retail was still contracting 3.0%.

This data does not prove that consumers cut gadgets first. The SPE does not record the order of decisions in consumers' minds. But the pattern offers one relevant signal for marketers: categories with higher-value or more easily postponed purchases face different pressure from spending that is functional or harder to eliminate.

In other words, contraction does not always mean demand has disappeared. In some categories, the problem may be demand whose timing has shifted.

A gadget not bought this month is not necessarily unwanted. Consumers may simply need a stronger financial reason to buy now.

Four Ways Consumers Respond to Budget Pressure

Rather than seeing consumers merely as "more frugal," the pattern is more useful when read through four forms of response:

1. Protect: spending that is hard to eliminate

Daily necessities and functional spending have a relatively high threshold for postponement.

Food, utilities, transportation, and vehicle maintenance may still be adjusted, but the underlying need is not easily removed from the budget.

2. Preserve: small spending still considered worthwhile

Some categories are kept because the benefit or satisfaction they provide is still considered worth the amount spent.

Beauty, personal care, dining out, or certain forms of entertainment can fall into this space. What changes is not always the category, but how much consumers are willing to pay and how often they buy.

3. Postpone: purchases that can wait

Gadgets, electronics, durable goods, and some discretionary purchases have greater room for postponement.

The problem for brands in these categories is not always a disappearing need, but an extended purchase cycle.

4. Trade down: still buying, but with compromises

Consumers can also stay in a category while lowering the cost per transaction: choosing smaller sizes, more affordable products, basic variants, or alternative brands.

This matters because a decline in transaction value does not always mean a loss of consumer interest in the category.

Thus, "consumer slowdown" does not always mean one thing. Brands need to distinguish whether they are facing lost demand, postponed demand, reduced frequency, or consumers trading down.

Not All Spending Is Being Cut

In the same Bank Indonesia table, spare parts and accessories kept growing at double digits across almost the entire contraction period. Food, beverages, and tobacco fell most deeply to -4.1% in May, then returned to positive 2.4% in July.

The decline was shallower and the recovery faster than in information and communication equipment.

The signal is not that consumers suddenly prioritize one specific category. What is more relevant is that each category has a different postponement threshold.

Functional categories may have purchase reasons that are harder to delay. Conversely, purchases with a high ticket size and a long purchase cycle give consumers more room to wait.

For this reason, it is not enough for brands to look at whether their category is growing or falling. They need to understand what kind of demand pressure is occurring within that category.

Household Budget Space Is Indeed Becoming More Selective

How little room remains is visible from the household side.

BPS data processed by Mandiri Institute, as reported by Kontan, records that the number of middle-class people fell from 47.9 million in 2024 to 46.7 million in 2025, while the aspiring middle class swelled to 142 million people, or 50.4% of the population.

The Katadata Indonesia Middle Class Insight (KIMCI) 2026 research translates this to the wallet level: 40.5% of the middle class's monthly income goes to consumption, and 63.6% of respondents have experienced spending exceeding their income.

Under these conditions, adjustments are most likely to occur in the most flexible layer of spending.

So the question changes.

No longer:

"Have young people stopped shopping?"

But rather:

"When they have to choose, which spending is still considered worth buying now?"

Gen Z and Millennials Do Not Make the Same Trade-offs

A YouGov survey shows that spending priorities also differ across generations. Gen Z Indonesians' top three spending priorities are beauty and personal care (21%), fashion (20%), and dining out (14%).

Millennials place different items at the top: groceries (39%), electricity (19%), and housing (16%).

This difference matters because purchasing power pressure does not produce a single pattern of "consumer cutback."

Millennials more often face household expenses that are hard to compress. Gen Z places a number of lifestyle categories higher in their spending priorities.

The two datasets stand on their own. The YouGov figures come from a consumer survey, while the Bank Indonesia figures come from a retailer survey. The YouGov data therefore cannot be used to directly explain category movements in the SPE.

However, both provide equally relevant context: spending priorities are not identical to the most basic needs, and consumer trade-offs differ depending on the expense structure they face.

For brands, the implication is simple but important: do not build a single "consumer slowdown" strategy for all young consumers.

Gen Z may be more responsive to accessibility, entry price, and frequency. Millennials with heavier household burdens may be more sensitive to functional value, total cost, and payment flexibility.

Why Can Small Spending Still Hold Up?

One consumer hypothesis is relevant for reading this pattern: the lipstick effect.

When large purchases are postponed, consumers can still maintain relatively small spending that provides immediate benefit or satisfaction. In theory, postponing small spending yields limited savings, while the sacrifice in comfort or gratification can feel greater.

However, the available data is not sufficient to conclude that Indonesian Gen Z's consumption pattern is specifically a lipstick effect.

For marketers, the label itself is actually not the most important thing.

What matters more is the visible trade-off: consumers can reduce their exposure to high-value purchases while maintaining categories with a lower ticket size.

Therefore, a Gen Z consumer who still buys skincare or eats out does not necessarily have secure purchasing power. Large amounts can be held back while small amounts are maintained.

Frequency can look stable while total consumer spending is actually declining.

So, Where Are Young People's Budgets Actually Being Cut?

The available data does not directly measure the order in which budgets are cut. But the cross-category pattern in Bank Indonesia's Retail Sales Survey gives a picture of which types of spending are more vulnerable when spending space narrows.

Easier to postpone

Gadgets and electronics, durable goods, some fashion, and recreational goods.

Larger ticket size, longer purchase cycle, and consumers can delay purchases for several months without immediately losing core functionality.

Still maintained with adjustments

Beauty, personal care, dining out, and certain entertainment.

Consumption can continue through smaller sizes, more affordable products, lower frequency, or changes in brand choice.

Harder to eliminate

Daily necessities and functional spending such as food, utilities, transportation, and vehicle maintenance.

What is happening is not a halt in consumption, but a reallocation of spending.

What Does This Mean for Brands?

1. Distinguish lost demand from postponed demand

A few months of contraction in gadgets does not automatically mean consumers have stopped wanting them.

If the problem is timing, the relevant strategy is not just discounts but a demand unlocker: light installments, trade-ins, price guarantees, or other mechanisms that lower the risk of buying now.

2. Protect the entry point

When consumers trade down, they do not always leave the category. They look for ways to stay in the category at a lower cost.

Entry price, pack size, basic variants, and small bundles can preserve consumers' access to the brand while a full purchase is being postponed.

3. Do not treat growing categories as proof of recovered purchasing power

Total retail turning positive in July does not apply evenly to all categories.

A category that keeps growing may simply be absorbing spending shifting from other categories. Category growth therefore needs to be read together with changes in other categories, not as a stand-alone signal of recovery.

4. Read the occasion, not just total spending

Apparel that rises and falls and weakening recreational goods hint that the timing of spending still matters.

For marketers, this information can be more useful for setting campaign calendars, seasonal activations, and promotional moments than simply looking at whether total retail is positive or negative.

5. Match strategy to the type of demand pressure

Consumer signal

Likely problem

Brand response

Large-ticket category weakens

Purchase postponed

Financing, trade-in, payment flexibility

Small-ticket category holds up

Consumers still seek affordable gratification

Protect entry SKU and frequency

Consumers still buy but at lower prices

Trade-down

Good-better-best architecture

Category highly dependent on occasion

Timing shifts

Occasion-led activation

Functional needs hold up

Demand is harder to postpone

Communicate utility and value

What Should Marketers Monitor Next?

Retail turning positive is not the end of the story. The recovery phase, in fact, needs to be read more carefully.

There are at least five signals to monitor:

  • Persistence: can categories that have recovered sustain their growth?

  • Depth: does the recovery come from higher volume and frequency, or mainly from transaction value?

  • Polarization: are consumers increasingly split between premium and entry-level, while the middle market is squeezed?

  • Deferred demand: are categories now in contraction starting to rebound after their purchase cycles lengthen?

  • Generational divergence: are Gen Z and Millennials increasingly making different trade-offs?

These five signals help brands tell a real recovery in purchasing power apart from a mere shift in spending allocation.

When Consumers Choose Again

When budget space narrows, consumers do not stop buying evenly.

They rearrange the composition of their spending: large purchases that are easy to postpone are more vulnerable to being sacrificed, while small spending that still feels affordable can be maintained. Some needs are protected, some are lowered in value, and some simply wait for a better moment.

For that reason, the strategic question for brands is no longer just "how do we keep consumers spending?"

The question is:

When consumers have to choose, what makes our category worth their money right now?

Consumer money is shifting priorities. Brands that read it only as "people are being frugal" will miss half of the information.

References

Bank Indonesia. (2026). Survei Penjualan Eceran Juli 2026 [Real Sales Index series table, Table 2: Annual Growth of the Real Sales Index (%, yoy)]. Bank Indonesia. https://www.bi.go.id (accessed 15 September 2026)

Bank Indonesia. (2026, July). Infografis Survei Penjualan Eceran Juni 2026. Bank Indonesia. https://www.bi.go.id (accessed 15 September 2026)

Katadata Insight Center. (2026). Katadata Indonesia Middle Class Insight (KIMCI) 2026. Katadata. https://katadata.co.id/finansial/makro/69df47ac69c99/riset-katadata-ungkap-tekanan-finansial-kelas-menengah-dan-ragam-jurus-bertahan (accessed 15 September 2026)

Kontan. (2026, February 8). Jumlah kelas menengah turun lebih dalam di 2025 tertekan daya beli dan konsumsi. Kontan. https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/jumlah-kelas-menengah-turun-lebih-dalam-di-2025-tertekan-daya-beli-dan-konsumsi (accessed 15 September 2026)

YouGov. (2026). Consumer spending priorities in Indonesia. YouGov. (accessed 15 September 2026)

Curated For You

Editorial Team

Related Article